minedMap.io
Geopolitics, decoded by algorithms.
Geopolitics, decoded by algorithms.
Geopolitics, decoded by algorithms.
Material Resilience Engine
Public demoNot certifiedOriginal alloy
Sanmac 304/304L
Austenitic stainless steel
Use case
Corrosion
Production method
Any route
Targets
2,781
Candidates
10,746
Source
Supabase
Material records
50,163
Unique materials
4,836
Compositions
3,206
Evidence links
30,671
Scenarios
6
Published bundle
30 files
Ranked candidates
Named material lane: Mo-bearing austenitic stainless steel
overall
90/100
properties
90/100
slightly lower scored signal
316L wire/feedstock is common, but qualification remains gated
Comparison
Named material candidate plus the model route that made it worth review.
| Property | Original | Candidate | Status | Trace |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | >= 210 MPa | 205 to 828 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 515 to 680 MPa | 515 to 895 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Corrosion resistance | moderate | moderate to high | review environment | demo bundle |
| Elongation | >= 45% | 10 to 45% | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Density | 7.9 g/cm3 | 4.43 to 8.19 g/cm3 | context dependent | demo bundle |
Closest stainless review candidate. It keeps the austenitic stainless lane and adds molybdenum for corrosion resistance, but chloride environment, product form, and joining route still need review.
Evidence still needed
Named material lane: titanium strength and corrosion candidate
overall
75/100
properties
75/100
larger chemistry jump
titanium feedstock route depends strongly on final component form
Comparison
Named material candidate plus the model route that made it worth review.
| Property | Original | Candidate | Status | Trace |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | >= 210 MPa | 205 to 828 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 515 to 680 MPa | 515 to 895 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Corrosion resistance | moderate | moderate to high | review environment | demo bundle |
| Elongation | >= 45% | 10 to 45% | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Density | 7.9 g/cm3 | 4.43 to 8.19 g/cm3 | context dependent | demo bundle |
Useful contrast candidate when corrosion and weight matter, but it is not a stainless drop-in. Review galvanic behavior, forming, joining, and cost before considering it.
Evidence still needed
Named material lane: nickel superalloy review candidate
overall
75/100
properties
75/100
not lower supply signal
superalloy processing and joining need separate qualification
Comparison
Named material candidate plus the model route that made it worth review.
| Property | Original | Candidate | Status | Trace |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | >= 210 MPa | 205 to 828 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 515 to 680 MPa | 515 to 895 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Corrosion resistance | moderate | moderate to high | review environment | demo bundle |
| Elongation | >= 45% | 10 to 45% | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Density | 7.9 g/cm3 | 4.43 to 8.19 g/cm3 | context dependent | demo bundle |
Useful as a high-performance comparison, not as a lower-risk answer. It helps show why the engine separates property fit from supply burden.
Evidence still needed
Material Resilience Engine
Public demoNot certifiedOriginal alloy
Sanmac 304/304L
Austenitic stainless steel
Use case
Corrosion
Production method
Any route
Targets
2,781
Candidates
10,746
Source
Supabase
Material records
50,163
Unique materials
4,836
Compositions
3,206
Evidence links
30,671
Scenarios
6
Published bundle
30 files
Ranked candidates
Named material lane: Mo-bearing austenitic stainless steel
overall
90/100
properties
90/100
slightly lower scored signal
316L wire/feedstock is common, but qualification remains gated
Comparison
Named material candidate plus the model route that made it worth review.
| Property | Original | Candidate | Status | Trace |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | >= 210 MPa | 205 to 828 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 515 to 680 MPa | 515 to 895 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Corrosion resistance | moderate | moderate to high | review environment | demo bundle |
| Elongation | >= 45% | 10 to 45% | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Density | 7.9 g/cm3 | 4.43 to 8.19 g/cm3 | context dependent | demo bundle |
Closest stainless review candidate. It keeps the austenitic stainless lane and adds molybdenum for corrosion resistance, but chloride environment, product form, and joining route still need review.
Evidence still needed
Named material lane: titanium strength and corrosion candidate
overall
75/100
properties
75/100
larger chemistry jump
titanium feedstock route depends strongly on final component form
Comparison
Named material candidate plus the model route that made it worth review.
| Property | Original | Candidate | Status | Trace |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | >= 210 MPa | 205 to 828 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 515 to 680 MPa | 515 to 895 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Corrosion resistance | moderate | moderate to high | review environment | demo bundle |
| Elongation | >= 45% | 10 to 45% | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Density | 7.9 g/cm3 | 4.43 to 8.19 g/cm3 | context dependent | demo bundle |
Useful contrast candidate when corrosion and weight matter, but it is not a stainless drop-in. Review galvanic behavior, forming, joining, and cost before considering it.
Evidence still needed
Named material lane: nickel superalloy review candidate
overall
75/100
properties
75/100
not lower supply signal
superalloy processing and joining need separate qualification
Comparison
Named material candidate plus the model route that made it worth review.
| Property | Original | Candidate | Status | Trace |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield strength | >= 210 MPa | 205 to 828 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 515 to 680 MPa | 515 to 895 MPa | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Corrosion resistance | moderate | moderate to high | review environment | demo bundle |
| Elongation | >= 45% | 10 to 45% | candidate overlap | demo bundle |
| Density | 7.9 g/cm3 | 4.43 to 8.19 g/cm3 | context dependent | demo bundle |
Useful as a high-performance comparison, not as a lower-risk answer. It helps show why the engine separates property fit from supply burden.
Evidence still needed